Re: [PATCH] refs: Always pass old object name to reftx hook
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 13, 2021, 20:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqbldsy4un.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <X/7X5ku3wvMr2hw6@ncase>
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:07:22PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:37:21AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> > Quick ping on this patch. Is there any interest or shall I just drop it? >> >> Apologies for completely dropping this from inbox. I am interested in >> it, and the patch looks good to me. I suspect the reason that this never >> got queued was that nobody reviewed it. > > No worries. > >> Would you consider resubmitting this patch if you are still interested >> in pushing it forwards? > > I can, but does it help to resubmit the same patch? Your response bumped > the thread up to the top anyway.
Bumping without resending would often not help people to see the patch at all.
For example, already-read-and-old messages are not even shown to me unless I ask my newsreader "I told you to show only the latest 200 messages, and I see this recent 'bump' message, but it responds to a way old message so you need to show me the latest 3000 messages to cover that era in order to see the patch message(s) it bumps."
Thanks.