Re: [PATCH] refs: Always pass old object name to reftx hook

> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:07:22PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:37:21AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> >> > Quick ping on this patch. Is there any interest or shall I just drop it?
> >> 
> >> Apologies for completely dropping this from inbox. I am interested in
> >> it, and the patch looks good to me. I suspect the reason that this never
> >> got queued was that nobody reviewed it.
> >
> > No worries.
> >
> >> Would you consider resubmitting this patch if you are still interested
> >> in pushing it forwards?
> >
> > I can, but does it help to resubmit the same patch? Your response bumped
> > the thread up to the top anyway.
> 
> Bumping without resending would often not help people to see the
> patch at all.
> 
> For example, already-read-and-old messages are not even shown to me
> unless I ask my newsreader "I told you to show only the latest 200
> messages, and I see this recent 'bump' message, but it responds to a
> way old message so you need to show me the latest 3000 messages to
> cover that era in order to see the patch message(s) it bumps."