Re: Patch Series v3 for "use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 4, 2014, 19:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqa9c0q4i3.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140404181215.GJ6851@google.com>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> 140 patches worth of churn once every couple of years is not terrible, > but I really don't want to see this becoming a pattern. :/
Likewise.
> And I don't see how the upside in this example warrants it.
Paraphrasing http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/943020
It'd be good if we don't _add_ such things to the tree.
But IMO it's such a minor thing that once it _is_ in the tree, it's not really worth the patch noise to go and fix it up.