Re: [PATCH v2] clean: improve -n and -f implementation and documentation

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mar 4, 2024, 18:41 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqa5ndq1op.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <87h6hl96z7.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>

Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes:

Show 11 quoted lines

> I wonder do you mean:
> 
> 	/* Dry run won't remove anything, so requiring force makes no
> 	* sense. Interactive has its own means of protection, so don't
> 	* require force as well */
> 	if (dry_run || interactive)
> 		require_force = 0;
>
> 	if (require_force != 0 && !force)
>                 die_();
> ...

That is explained in a few messages after this one, so I'll wait until you read them all before responding ;-).

Thanks.