Re: [PATCH v2] clean: improve -n and -f implementation and documentation

> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I wonder do you mean:
>> 
>> 	/* Dry run won't remove anything, so requiring force makes no
>> 	* sense. Interactive has its own means of protection, so don't
>> 	* require force as well */
>> 	if (dry_run || interactive)
>> 		require_force = 0;
>>
>> 	if (require_force != 0 && !force)
>>                 die_();
>> ...
>
> That is explained in a few messages after this one, so I'll wait
> until you read them all before responding ;-).