Re: [PATCH 0/11] jk/loose-object-cache sha1/object_id fixups
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 8, 2019, 18:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq8szv56e4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqmuob58gu.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > >> Yeah, they should. I think one of them will need René's patch, which >> changes the body of quick_has_loose(). I can roll it as a separate topic >> if that's easier (or just wait a week or so until René's cleanups >> graduate). > > Nah, what I got is already good to work with. Both series are > straight-forward and I do not expect them needing long fermentation.
Yikes, the conflicts with sb/more-repo-in-api is quite irritating. I think I'll postpone the later parts of this series and ask this to be sent after sb/more-repo-in-api matures a bit mroe.