Re: [PATCH] Detect endianness on more platforms that don't use BYTE_ORDER
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 2, 2014, 19:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq7g64asae.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140502165830.GA29339@hashpling.org>
Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net> writes:
> I claim that any > platform which provides both but with differing senses is somewhat > broken so I cannot see the precedence mattering much.
I agree with that, and that is the reason why we shouldn't change the order all of a sudden. If it shouldn't matter, then there is only downside of a possiblity to break such an insane set-up that has been happily working by accident, without helping anybody if we change it, no?