Re: [PATCH v2] Fix detection of uname failure
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 17, 2015, 21:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq7fpy1n0z.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7cf6757e8e81c2f9e102db24efbedb2a@www.dscho.org>
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On 2015-07-17 19:09, Charles Bailey wrote: >> From: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net> >> >> According to POSIX specification uname must return -1 on failure and a >> non-negative value on success. Although many implementations do return 0 >> on success it is valid to return any positive value for success. In >> particular, Solaris returns 1. >> >> Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net> > > Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
I'd s/Ack/Review/; as the original is not your code but you are well qualified (and have my trust) to judge the change to this codepath ;-)
Thanks.