Re: [PATCH 8/8] ci: drop redundant linux-reftable job
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 9, 2026, 20:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq7bjqoc8j.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <asiB25AareJgkKL5@pks.im>
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> So how about arguing the other way round and making the job more useful? > We don't have good test coverage of reftables with SHA256, so we could > adapt the job to exercise that combination.
Yeah, instead of doing sha1 and leaks, doing sha1 and sha256 would be much more useful ;-).