Show 18 quoted lines
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:19:56PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
>> Maybe squash this in some place, or leave it separate. I'm fine either way.
>
> Thanks, this makes sense. I've left it as a separate commit.
>
> Your subject did not quite make sense to me, as the effect is to _not_
> report .bitmap files as garbage. I updated the commit message to this:
>
> count-objects: recognize .bitmap in garbage-checking
>
> Count-objects will report any "garbage" files in the packs
> directory, including files whose extensions it does not
> know (case 1), and files whose matching ".pack" file is
> missing (case 2). Without having learned about ".bitmap"
> files, the current code reports all such files as garbage
> (case 1), even if their pack exists. Instead, they should be
> treated as case 2.