Re: [PATCH] format-patch: introduce format.outputDirectory configuration
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 19, 2015, 15:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq616jbse8.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CANCZXo72BscpXKGAtVPt_1QuffcOpTz6nGB+__q0JLisuTaKsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com> writes:
Show 31 quoted lines
> 2015-06-19 3:46 GMT+06:00 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
>> I agree with "later -o should override an earlier one", but I do not
>> necessarily agree with "'-o -' should be --stdout", for a simple
>> reason that "-o foo" is not "--stdout >foo".
>>
>> Perhaps something like this to replace builtin/ part of Alexander's
>> patch?
>>
>> @@ -1337,6 +1342,9 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>> die (_("--subject-prefix and -k are mutually exclusive."));
>> rev.preserve_subject = keep_subject;
>>
>> + if (!output_directory && !use_stdout)
>> + output_directory = config_output_directory;
>> +
>>
>
> But there is following condition above:
>
> if (!use_stdout)
> output_directory = set_outdir(prefix, output_directory);
>
> After which output_directory will be "./" everytime and
>
>>
>> + if (!output_directory && !use_stdout)
>> + output_directory = config_output_directory;
>> +
>>
>
> will not work here.I thought I made that "if we did not see '-o dir' on the command line, initialize output_directory to what we read from the config" before we make a call to set_outdir().
What I am missing?
Puzzled... FWIW, IIRC, the patch you are responding to passed the test you added.