Re: [PATCH 3/6] fsck: prepare dummy objects for --connectivity-check
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 17, 2017, 21:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq60lde6a0.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170116213204.e7ykwowqzafkexqd@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> + # Drop the index now; we want to be sure that we > + # recursively notice that we notice the broken objects > + # because they are reachable from refs, not because > + # they are in the index.
Rephrase to reduce redundunt "notice"s?