Show 22 quoted lines
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 07:01:22PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 01:12:55AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> > This is in gcc 4.9.0:
>> >
>> > wt-status.c: In function ‘wt_status_print_unmerged_header’:
>> > wt-status.c:191:2: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length]
>> > status_printf_ln(s, c, "");
>> > ^
>> >
>> > We could pass -Wno-format-zero-length, but it seems compiler-specific
>> > flags are frowned upon, so let's just avoid the warning altogether.
>>
>> I believe these warnings existed before GCC 4.9 as well, but I'm not
>> opposed to the change.
>
> Yeah, this started last summer when we added __attribute__((format)) to
> the status_printf_ln calls, and I posted essentially the same patch. We
> kind of waffled between "eh, just set -Wno-format-zero-length" and doing
> something, and ended up at the former. I'd be fine with doing it this
> way; we're not likely to add a lot of new callsites that would make it a
> hassle to keep up with.