Re: [PATCH] branch: -r -d(D) should say "remote-tracking branch"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 6, 2015, 17:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq4mnpvbgt.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAN0XMOJ8QJ14B15BoFrr7d7L-jE06yUbquo8pW3OCj4wmUk2Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> writes:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Danny Lin <danny0838@gmail.com> wrote: >> git branch -r -d(D) currently says "delete remote branch", >> which should be "remote-tracking branch". >> --- > > No "Signed-off-by" line. (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches) > >> builtin/branch.c | 6 +++--- >> po/bg.po | 6 +++--- >> po/ca.po | 6 +++--- >> po/de.po | 6 +++--- >> po/fr.po | 6 +++--- >> po/git.pot | 6 +++--- >> po/it.po | 6 +++--- >> po/pt_PT.po | 6 +++--- >> po/sv.po | 6 +++--- >> po/vi.po | 6 +++--- >> po/zh_CN.po | 6 +++--- >> 11 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) >> > > You don't need to update messages within "po/*" as they're > updated by the l10n coordinator and translators.
Thanks for pointing it out, but the language should be stronger; not "don't need to", but "you must not".
Thanks.
Show 36 quoted lines
>> diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
>> index dc6f0b2..3560c51 100644
>> --- a/builtin/branch.c
>> +++ b/builtin/branch.c
>> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char
>> **argv, int force, int kinds,
>> sha1, &flags);
>> if (!target) {
>> error(remote_branch
>> - ? _("remote branch '%s' not found.")
>> + ? _("remote-tracking branch '%s' not found.")
>> : _("branch '%s' not found."), bname.buf);
>> ret = 1;
>> continue;
>> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char
>> **argv, int force, int kinds,
>>
>> if (delete_ref(name, sha1, REF_NODEREF)) {
>> error(remote_branch
>> - ? _("Error deleting remote branch '%s'")
>> + ? _("Error deleting remote-tracking branch '%s'")
>> : _("Error deleting branch '%s'"),
>> bname.buf);
>> ret = 1;
>> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char
>> **argv, int force, int kinds,
>> }
>> if (!quiet) {
>> printf(remote_branch
>> - ? _("Deleted remote branch %s (was %s).\n")
>> + ? _("Deleted remote-tracking branch %s (was %s).\n")
>> : _("Deleted branch %s (was %s).\n"),
>> bname.buf,
>> (flags & REF_ISBROKEN) ? "broken"
>
> Looks good to me.