From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 17:53:54 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] branch: -r -d(D) should say "remote-tracking branch" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Ralf Thielow writes: > Danny Lin wrote: >> git branch -r -d(D) currently says "delete remote branch", >> which should be "remote-tracking branch". >> --- > > No "Signed-off-by" line. (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches) > >> builtin/branch.c | 6 +++--- >> po/bg.po | 6 +++--- >> po/ca.po | 6 +++--- >> po/de.po | 6 +++--- >> po/fr.po | 6 +++--- >> po/git.pot | 6 +++--- >> po/it.po | 6 +++--- >> po/pt_PT.po | 6 +++--- >> po/sv.po | 6 +++--- >> po/vi.po | 6 +++--- >> po/zh_CN.po | 6 +++--- >> 11 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) >> > > You don't need to update messages within "po/*" as they're > updated by the l10n coordinator and translators. Thanks for pointing it out, but the language should be stronger; not "don't need to", but "you must not". Thanks. >> diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c >> index dc6f0b2..3560c51 100644 >> --- a/builtin/branch.c >> +++ b/builtin/branch.c >> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char >> **argv, int force, int kinds, >> sha1, &flags); >> if (!target) { >> error(remote_branch >> - ? _("remote branch '%s' not found.") >> + ? _("remote-tracking branch '%s' not found.") >> : _("branch '%s' not found."), bname.buf); >> ret = 1; >> continue; >> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char >> **argv, int force, int kinds, >> >> if (delete_ref(name, sha1, REF_NODEREF)) { >> error(remote_branch >> - ? _("Error deleting remote branch '%s'") >> + ? _("Error deleting remote-tracking branch '%s'") >> : _("Error deleting branch '%s'"), >> bname.buf); >> ret = 1; >> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char >> **argv, int force, int kinds, >> } >> if (!quiet) { >> printf(remote_branch >> - ? _("Deleted remote branch %s (was %s).\n") >> + ? _("Deleted remote-tracking branch %s (was %s).\n") >> : _("Deleted branch %s (was %s).\n"), >> bname.buf, >> (flags & REF_ISBROKEN) ? "broken" > > Looks good to me.