git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fsck for lazy objects, and (now) actual invocation of loader

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Jul 31, 2017, 21:21 UTC
Message-ID
<xmqq4ltsi9or.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To
<cover.1501532294.git.jonathantanmy@google.com>
Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Besides review changes, this patch set now includes my rewritten
> lazy-loading sha1_file patch, so you can now do this (excerpted from one
> of the tests):
>
>     test_create_repo server
>     test_commit -C server 1 1.t abcdefgh
>     HASH=$(git hash-object server/1.t)
>     
>     test_create_repo client
>     test_must_fail git -C client cat-file -p "$HASH"
>     git -C client config core.repositoryformatversion 1
>     git -C client config extensions.lazyobject \
>         "\"$TEST_DIRECTORY/t0410/lazy-object\" \"$(pwd)/server/.git\""
>     git -C client cat-file -p "$HASH"
>
> with fsck still working. Also, there is no need for a list of promised
> blobs, and the long-running process protocol is being used.

I do not think I read your response to my last comment on this series, so I could be missing something large, but I am afraid that the resulting fsck is only half as useful as the normal fsck. I do not see it any better than a hypothetical castrated version of fsck that only checks the integrity of objects that appear in the local object store, without doing any connectivity checks.

Don't get me wrong. The integrity check on local objects you still do is important---that is what allows us to make sure that the local "cache" does not prevent us from going to the real source of the remote object store by having a corrupt copy.

But not being able to tell if a missing object is OK to be missing (because we can get them if/as needed from elsewhere) or we lost the sole copy of an object that we created and have not pushed out (hence we are in deep yogurt) makes it pretty much pointless to run "fsck", doesn't it? It does not give us any guarantee that our repository plus perfect network connectivity gives us an environment to build further work on.

Or am I missing something fundamental?
Previous: Ben PeartNext: Jonathan Tan
Message 29 of 40 in “Some patches for fsck for missing objects”
  1. 0/4 Some patches for fsck for missing objectsJonathan Tan, Jul 26, 2017
  2. 1/4 environment, fsck: introduce lazyobject extensionJonathan Tan, Jul 26, 2017
  3. Junio C HamanoJul 27, 2017
  4. Ben PeartJul 28, 2017
  5. Jonathan TanJul 28, 2017
  6. Junio C HamanoJul 29, 2017
  7. 2/4 fsck: support refs pointing to lazy objectsJonathan Tan, Jul 26, 2017
  8. Junio C HamanoJul 27, 2017
  9. Jonathan TanJul 27, 2017
  10. Ben PeartJul 28, 2017
  11. tests: ensure fsck fails on corrupt packfilesJonathan Tan, Jul 28, 2017
  12. 3/4 fsck: support referenced lazy objectsJonathan Tan, Jul 26, 2017
  13. Junio C HamanoJul 27, 2017
  14. Jonathan TanJul 27, 2017
  15. Junio C HamanoJul 29, 2017
  16. 4/4 fsck: support lazy objects as CLI argumentJonathan Tan, Jul 26, 2017
  17. brian m. carlsonJul 26, 2017
  18. Stefan BellerJul 27, 2017
  19. Jonathan TanJul 27, 2017
  20. Ben PeartJul 28, 2017
  21. 0/5 Fsck for lazy objects, and (now) actual invocation of loaderJonathan Tan, Jul 31, 2017
  22. 1/5 environment, fsck: introduce lazyobject extensionJonathan Tan, Jul 31, 2017
  23. 2/5 fsck: support refs pointing to lazy objectsJonathan Tan, Jul 31, 2017
  24. 4/5 fsck: support lazy objects as CLI argumentJonathan Tan, Jul 31, 2017
  25. 3/5 fsck: support referenced lazy objectsJonathan Tan, Jul 31, 2017
  26. 5/5 sha1_file: support loading lazy objectsJonathan Tan, Jul 31, 2017
  27. Junio C HamanoJul 31, 2017
  28. Ben PeartAug 8, 2017
  29. Junio C HamanoJul 31, 2017
  30. Jonathan TanJul 31, 2017
  31. Junio C HamanoAug 1, 2017
  32. Jonathan NiederAug 1, 2017
  33. Junio C HamanoAug 1, 2017
  34. Jonathan TanAug 2, 2017
  35. Junio C HamanoAug 2, 2017
  36. Jonathan NiederAug 2, 2017
  37. Junio C HamanoAug 2, 2017
  38. Jonathan NiederAug 2, 2017
  39. Jonathan TanAug 3, 2017
  40. Ben PeartAug 8, 2017

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.