Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Some patches for fsck for missing objects
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Jul 27, 2017, 00:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kbLVor39Hs+OnhiFwXOpJtTGMiENvunCVv_Q-PB-Mfczw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170726234238.2osugw2lheubmetw@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:42 PM, brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:29:58PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote: >> This is an updated version of my previous patch [1], but without the >> list of promises. It is somewhat different now because fsck cannot just >> mark all promised objects as HAS_OBJ. >> >> This could be adapted and incorporated into patch sets that have objects >> missing from the local repo. >> >> I split this up into 4 patches so that you can see how the changes in >> fsck are being tested, but eventually these should probably be combined >> into 1 patch. > > I looked at this and I like the direction it's going. It's pretty > simple and straightforward, which I also like.
I agree.