Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] alternate hash test
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2018, 21:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq4ln3t5o7.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180128170639.216397-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
> This series wires up an alternate hash implementation, namely > BLAKE2b-160. The goal is to allow us to identify tests which rely on > the hash algorithm in use so that we can fix those tests.
Yay.
> Provoking discussion of which hash to pick for NewHash is explicitly > *not* a goal for this series. I'm only interested in the ability to > identify and fix tests.
Double yay.