From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 21:09:28 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] alternate hash test
Message-ID: <xmqq4ln3t5o7.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180128170639.216397-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>

"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:

> This series wires up an alternate hash implementation, namely
> BLAKE2b-160.  The goal is to allow us to identify tests which rely on
> the hash algorithm in use so that we can fix those tests.

Yay.

> Provoking discussion of which hash to pick for NewHash is explicitly
> *not* a goal for this series.  I'm only interested in the ability to
> identify and fix tests.

Double yay.