Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 23, 2024, 18:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq4jdzt4yw.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <pull.1651.v4.git.1708677266.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I recently looked into issues where git merge-tree calls returned bogus data > (in one instance returning an empty tree for non-empty merge parents). By > the time I had a look at the corresponding repository, the issue was no > longer reproducible, but a closer look at the code combined with some manual > experimenting turned up the fact that missing tree objects aren't handled as > errors by git merge-tree.
Looking good. Will replace. Thanks.