Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] run-commands: add an async queue processor

> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:05:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> The primary reason I suspect is because you sent to a wrong set of
>> people.  Submodule folks have largely been working in the scripted
>> ones, and may not necessarily be the ones who are most familiar with
>> the run-command infrastructure.
>> 
>> "shortlog --no-merges" tells me that the obvious suspects are j6t
>> and peff.
>
> No good deed goes unpunished. ;)
>
> Before even looking at the implementation, my first question would be
> whether this pattern is applicable in several places in git (i.e., is it
> worth the extra complexity of abstracting out in the first place). I
> think there are a few task-queue patterns already in git; for example
> the delta search in pack-objects. Is the interface given here sufficient
> to convert pack-objects? Is the result nicer to read? Is it as
> efficient?
>
> We do not need to convert all possible call-sites to the new abstracted
> code at once. But I find that converting at least _one_ is a good litmus
> test to confirm that a new interface is generally useful.