Re: [PATCH 0/6] [GSOC][RFC] ref-filter: add %(raw:textconv) and %(raw:filters)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 7, 2021, 05:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq35tuw74h.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <pull.972.git.1622884415.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> The current series is based on 0efed9435 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) > atom)
I do not have that commit object, but these six patches include the two commits that are %(raw) and %(raw:size), so I'll just discard the old round that wasn't based on the atom-type stuff and queue these six as a single series.
As I already said, I am not sure how %(rest) makes any sense outside the context of "cat-file --batch"; I suspect it would make more sense to make it easier to arrange certain placeholders to error out when used in a context where they do not make sense (e.g. use of --rest in "git branch --list").