git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] merge-ours: integrate with sparse-index

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Feb 6, 2026, 13:35 UTC
Message-ID
<xmqq343ehu4o.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To
<20b9e0bf6e2b12eea1ff50b14d0d2809c601a943.1770345124.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
"Sam Bostock via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> From: Sam Bostock <sam@sambostock.ca>
>
> The merge-ours builtin reads the index only to compare it against HEAD
> via index_differs_from(), whose diff machinery (run_diff_index) is
> already sparse-aware.
>
> Teach merge-ours to opt out of requiring a full index by setting
> command_requires_full_index to 0.
> Because merge-ours is invoked as a
> subprocess by "git merge -s ours"
It may be correct but I do not see a relevance
> and never previously read config,
> the global variables core_apply_sparse_checkout and
> core_sparse_checkout_cone remained unset,

This may be correct, but it only becomes relevant after somebody decides to do something to cause is_sparse_index_allowed() to say Yes.

> causing
> is_sparse_index_allowed() to return false and the index to be expanded
> anyway. Add a repo_config() call with git_default_config to populate
> these globals.

In total, while individual sentences in the above may tell correct things, the order of presentation makes it hard to understand, at least to me.

The usual way to compose a log message of this project is to
 - Give an observation on how the current system works in the
   present tense (so no need to say "Currently X is Y", or
   "Previously X was Y" to describe the state before your change;
   just "X is Y" is enough), and discuss what you perceive as a
   problem in it.
 - Propose a solution (optional---often, problem description
   trivially leads to an obvious solution in reader's minds).
 - Give commands to somebody editing the codebase to "make it so",
   instead of saying "This commit does X".
in this order.
So perhaps
    The merge-ours built-in opens the index to compare it against
    HEAD.  The machinery used to do this (i.e. run_diff_index()) is
    capable of working with sparse index, but because of the start
    up sequence of this command does not take necessary steps, we
    end up first expanding the index fully before doing this
    comparison.
    In order to convince sparse-index.c:is_sparse_index_allowed() to
    return true, we need to:
    - enable the global switch "core_apply_sparse_checkout" via
      the core.sparsecheckout configuration variable.  merge-ours
      currently do not even read basic configuration, so we need to
      make the configuration call ourselves.
    - set command_requires_full_index to 0.
    With that, the command can work without expanding the index
    fully before doing its work.
or something.
Thanks.
Show 59 quoted lines
> Add tests to t1092 verifying that "git merge -s ours" produces
> identical results across full-checkout, sparse-checkout, and
> sparse-index modes, including verifying the resulting merge commit
> structure, and that the sparse index is not expanded during the
> operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Bostock <sam@sambostock.ca>
> ---
>  builtin/merge-ours.c                     |  6 ++++++
>  t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/merge-ours.c b/builtin/merge-ours.c
> index 2312e58ab3..405b2989f7 100644
> --- a/builtin/merge-ours.c
> +++ b/builtin/merge-ours.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>  
>  #include "git-compat-util.h"
>  #include "builtin.h"
> +#include "config.h"
> +#include "environment.h"
>  #include "diff.h"
>  
>  static const char builtin_merge_ours_usage[] =
> @@ -22,6 +24,10 @@ int cmd_merge_ours(int argc,
>  {
>  	show_usage_if_asked(argc, argv, builtin_merge_ours_usage);
>  
> +	repo_config(repo, git_default_config, NULL);
> +	prepare_repo_settings(repo);
> +	repo->settings.command_requires_full_index = 0;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * The contents of the current index becomes the tree we
>  	 * commit.  The index must match HEAD, or this merge cannot go
> diff --git a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
> index b0f691c151..d98cb4ac11 100755
> --- a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
> +++ b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
> @@ -2559,4 +2559,18 @@ test_expect_success 'cat-file --batch' '
>  	ensure_expanded cat-file --batch <in
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'merge -s ours' '
> +	init_repos &&
> +
> +	test_all_match git rev-parse HEAD^{tree} &&
> +	test_all_match git merge -s ours merge-right &&
> +	test_all_match git rev-parse HEAD^{tree} &&
> +	test_all_match git rev-parse HEAD^2
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'sparse-index is not expanded: merge-ours' '
> +	init_repos &&
> +	ensure_not_expanded merge -s ours merge-right
> +'
> +
>  test_done
Previous: Sam Bostock via GitGitGadgetNext: Sam Bostock via GitGitGadget
Message 6 of 11 in “merge-ours: sparse-index integration”
  1. 0/2 merge-ours: sparse-index integrationSam Bostock via GitGitGadget, Feb 6, 2026
  2. 1/2 merge-ours: drop USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLESam Bostock via GitGitGadget, Feb 6, 2026
  3. Patrick SteinhardtFeb 6, 2026
  4. Junio C HamanoFeb 6, 2026
  5. 2/2 merge-ours: integrate with sparse-indexSam Bostock via GitGitGadget, Feb 6, 2026
  6. Junio C HamanoFeb 6, 2026
  7. 0/2 merge-ours: sparse-index integrationSam Bostock via GitGitGadget, Feb 6, 2026
  8. 2/2 merge-ours: integrate with sparse-indexSam Bostock via GitGitGadget, Feb 6, 2026
  9. 1/2 merge-ours: drop USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLESam Bostock via GitGitGadget, Feb 6, 2026
  10. Patrick SteinhardtFeb 9, 2026
  11. Derrick StoleeFeb 10, 2026

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.