Re: [PATCH] wt-status: i18n of section labels
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 12, 2014, 20:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq1ty7kwfp.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <5320BE1C.9020307@savoirfairelinux.com>
Sandy Carter <sandy.carter@savoirfairelinux.com> writes:
Show 35 quoted lines
> Le 2014-03-12 15:22, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
>> static const char *wt_status_diff_status_string(int status)
>> {
>> switch (status) {
>> case DIFF_STATUS_ADDED:
>> - return _("new file");
>> + return _("new file:");
>> case DIFF_STATUS_COPIED:
>> - return _("copied");
>> + return _("copied:");
>> case DIFF_STATUS_DELETED:
>> - return _("deleted");
>> + return _("deleted:");
>> case DIFF_STATUS_MODIFIED:
>> - return _("modified");
>> + return _("modified:");
>> case DIFF_STATUS_RENAMED:
>> - return _("renamed");
>> + return _("renamed:");
>> case DIFF_STATUS_TYPE_CHANGED:
>> - return _("typechange");
>> + return _("typechange:");
>> case DIFF_STATUS_UNKNOWN:
>> - return _("unknown");
>> + return _("unknown:");
>> case DIFF_STATUS_UNMERGED:
>> - return _("unmerged");
>> + return _("unmerged:");
>> default:
>> - return NULL;
>> + return _("bug");
>> + }
>> +}
>
> I don't see why _("bug") is returned when, later down,When there is a bug in the caller.
Show 17 quoted lines
>
>> @@ -305,21 +346,16 @@ static void wt_status_print_change_data(struct wt_status *s,
>> struct strbuf onebuf = STRBUF_INIT, twobuf = STRBUF_INIT;
>> struct strbuf extra = STRBUF_INIT;
>> static char *padding;
>> + static int label_width;
>> const char *what;
>> int len;
>>
>> if (!padding) {
>> - int width = 0;
>> - /* If DIFF_STATUS_* uses outside this range, we're in trouble */
>> - for (status = 'A'; status <= 'Z'; status++) {
>> - what = wt_status_diff_status_string(status);
>> - len = what ? strlen(what) : 0;
>
> checks for NULL.That extra NULL-ness check can go, I think. Thanks for double-checking.