Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] submodule--helper: Have some refactoring only patches first
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 31, 2015, 20:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq1tejuscs.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1441048767-29729-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com>
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
> One of the mistakes I made last week was mixing these quite stable patches > with highly RFC/WIP patches and not pointing out loud which is which.
I think it was very clear which is which to people who have been following (which are the only people you would care about anyway), but I agree that it would be easier to follow by others if you made two series, i.e. solid bits like this one, marked with "PATCH v$n", and the WIP part as a separate series, described as building on the v$n reroll of the other series in its own cover letter.
Thanks, will replace. Let's move this part to 'next' and start cooking.