From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 20:15:47 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] submodule--helper: Have some refactoring only patches first
Message-ID: <xmqq1tejuscs.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <1441048767-29729-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com>

Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:

> One of the mistakes I made last week was mixing these quite stable patches
> with highly RFC/WIP patches and not pointing out loud which is which.

I think it was very clear which is which to people who have been
following (which are the only people you would care about anyway),
but I agree that it would be easier to follow by others if you made
two series, i.e. solid bits like this one, marked with "PATCH v$n",
and the WIP part as a separate series, described as building on the
v$n reroll of the other series in its own cover letter.

Thanks, will replace.  Let's move this part to 'next' and start
cooking.