Re: [PATCH v2] partial-clone: design doc
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 14, 2017, 18:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq1sjxuq0a.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20171214152404.35708-2-git@jeffhostetler.com>
Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com> writes:
> +- On the client these incomplete packfiles are marked as "promisor pacfiles"
s/pacfiles/packfiles/
Show 6 quoted lines
> + These "promisor packfiles" consist of a "<name>.promisor" file with > + arbitrary contents (like the "<name>.keep" files), in addition to > + their "<name>.pack" and "<name>.idx" files. > + > + In the future, this ability may be extended to loose objects in case > + a promisor packfile is accidentally unpacked.
Hmph.
Because we cannot assume that such an "accidental" unpacking would do anything extra to help us tell the loose objects created out of a promisor pack from other loose objects, you would end up making any and all loose objects to serve as if they came from a promisor remote? I am not sure if that makes much sense.
Do we really need to write this "in the future" down, before we have thought things through enough to specify the design at a bit more detailed level?