Re: Excessive mmap [was Git server eats all memory]
- From
- Ivan Kanis <expire-by-2010-08-14@kanis.fr>
- Date
- Aug 9, 2010, 16:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <westyn3n3sa.fsf@kanis.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTi=6JcwLuyNWq9oYzE_E+7DSn-sEvR-X3AHvXM6U@mail.gmail.com>
Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Though Git uses MAP_PRIVATE with mmap, this only marks mapped pages as > copy-on-write. Because cloning does not change the pack file, all those > pages should be shared.
I reran the test today. One client is receiving while the other one is compressing. I have to interrupt both client because the server is becoming unusable. I am sure you are right about sharing the pages but I can't test it.
> On 64-bit architecture, you have plenty virtual space, and mapping > a file to memory should not take much physical memory (only space > needed for system tables).
What I can tell from the mmap man page is that it should map memory to a file. I assume it shouldn't take up physical memory. However I am seeing physical memory being consumed. It might be a feature of the kernel. Is there a way to turn it off?
> You can reduce core.packedGitWindowSize in the Git configuration to > see if it helps, but I doubt that it will have any noticeable effect.
It was worth a shot, it didn't help...
Looking some more into it today the bulk of the memory allocation happens in write_pack_file in the following loop.
for (; i < nr_objects; i++) {
if (!write_one(f, objects + i, &offset))
break;
display_progress(progress_state, written);
}This eventually calls write_object, here I am wondering if the unuse_pack function is doing its job. As far as I can tell it writes a null in memory, that I think is not enough to reclaim memory.
I also looked at the use_pack function where the mmap is happening. Would it be worth refactoring this function so that it uses an index withing a file instead of mmap?
Unless I hear of a better idea I'll be trying that tomorrow...
Take care,
--
Ivan Kanis
I can stand brute force, but brute reason is quite unbearable. There
is something unfair about its use. It is hitting below the intellect.
-- Oscar Wilde