Re: EasyGit Integration
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@imag.fr>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2009, 14:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqzlcgxid5.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906091535410.6847@localhost.localdomain>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> I would not object to > > - old behavior: revert the commit by creating an "anti-commit": > > git revert <cmit-name> > > - new extension: revert the state of the working tree to the HEAD: > > git revert [--] pathspec > > which would kind of match the semantics of "git checkout" does.
That's subjective, but I would find this more misleading than the current behavior. To me, that would let beginners think that both commands do similar things, and then "why the hell does git revert HEAD^^ create a commit while git revert -- foo.c doesn't???"-kind of questions.
my 2 cents,
-- Matthieu