git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: EasyGit Integration

From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date
Jun 10, 2009, 06:43 UTC
Message-ID
<m3hbyo4mis.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To
<4A2F1FD0.8060303@vilain.net>
Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>> I think as long as there is a deprecation cycle, and that users can
>>> select the old behaviour (either via an alias or a config option), then
>>> we shouldn't upset many long-time users of revert. Do you agree?
>>>     
>>
>> I actually don't.
>>
>> I do not think introducing "git revert-file" (or "git revert -- path") is
>> a problem at all.  But "git revert $commit" has been and is an integral
>> part of the established git workflow, and I do not see a point in changing
>> it to mean something else, with any deprecation period.
>>   
> 
> Ok. Off-hand I can't remember why we excluded "git revert -- path" as
> workable. Whatever that reason was led to the group of core developers
> coming up with these "clearly" "_inferior_" names.

"git revert -- path" is perhaps not unambiguous (but for the fact whether it reverts from index, or from HEAD), but "git revert <rev> -- path" can be understood as "git cherry-pick -R <rev> -- path" i.e. reverting changes to given file or files in a commit.

And we have "git reset -- file", don't we.
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
Previous: Sam VilainNext: Nicolas Pitre
Message 43 of 49 in “EasyGit Integration”
  1. Scott ChaconJun 9, 2009
  2. Nicolas PitreJun 9, 2009
  3. Avery PennarunJun 9, 2009
  4. Björn SteinbrinkJun 9, 2009
  5. Avery PennarunJun 9, 2009
  6. Björn SteinbrinkJun 10, 2009
  7. Elijah NewrenJun 9, 2009
  8. Miles BaderJun 10, 2009
  9. Björn SteinbrinkJun 9, 2009
  10. Elijah NewrenJun 9, 2009
  11. Björn SteinbrinkJun 9, 2009
  12. Björn SteinbrinkJun 9, 2009
  13. Junio C HamanoJun 9, 2009
  14. Elijah NewrenJun 9, 2009
  15. Elijah NewrenJun 9, 2009
  16. Matthieu MoyJun 10, 2009
  17. Linus TorvaldsJun 9, 2009
  18. Elijah NewrenJun 9, 2009
  19. Linus TorvaldsJun 9, 2009
  20. Mark LodatoJun 10, 2009
  21. Miles BaderJun 10, 2009
  22. Theodore TsoJun 10, 2009
  23. Linus TorvaldsJun 10, 2009
  24. Felipe ContrerasJun 10, 2009
  25. Linus TorvaldsJun 10, 2009
  26. Scott ChaconJun 10, 2009
  27. Jakub NarebskiJun 11, 2009
  28. Felipe ContrerasJun 11, 2009
  29. Jakub NarebskiJun 11, 2009
  30. Felipe ContrerasJun 12, 2009
  31. Jakub NarebskiJun 12, 2009
  32. Felipe ContrerasJun 12, 2009
  33. Jakub NarebskiJun 12, 2009
  34. Felipe ContrerasJun 12, 2009
  35. Björn SteinbrinkJun 13, 2009
  36. Felipe ContrerasJun 11, 2009
  37. Elijah NewrenJun 10, 2009
  38. Matthieu MoyJun 10, 2009
  39. Sam VilainJun 10, 2009
  40. Linus TorvaldsJun 10, 2009
  41. Junio C HamanoJun 10, 2009
  42. Sam VilainJun 10, 2009
  43. Jakub NarebskiJun 10, 2009
  44. Nicolas PitreJun 10, 2009
  45. Junio C HamanoJun 10, 2009
  46. Elijah NewrenJun 10, 2009
  47. Scott ChaconJun 10, 2009
  48. Felipe ContrerasJun 10, 2009
  49. Felipe ContrerasJun 10, 2009

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.