Re: [PATCH 2/4] ref-filter: add ref-filter API
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- May 23, 2015, 22:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqwpzyc4aq.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqoalbciwj.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> And I do not think an array of things that are operated on should > not be named "ref_filter_item".
Is the double-negation intended? It seems contradictory with:
> Surely, the latter "set of operations to be applied" may currently > be only filtering, but who says it has to stay that way?
(With which I do agree)
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/