Re: Officially start moving to the term 'staging area'

> Matthieu Moy wrote:
>> These explanations make sense. I think it would be better to put part of
>> it in commit messages, so that future contributors can "git blame" the
>> doc/implem of these --stage and find them (i.e. avoid the
>> misunderstanding that occured with "git stage" command which was
>> proposed for removal).
>
> Yes, but which commit? All of them? Perhaps it would make sense to add a link
> to the cover e-mail, or add an explanation in Documentation/gitstagingarea.txt
> or something.