Re: should git command and git-command be equivalent?

From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@imag.fr>
Date: Oct 16, 2007, 14:46 UTC
Message-ID: <vpqhckri0ct.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <ee77f5c20710160528k520704d7pd3cf99dea1f83a77@mail.gmail.com>

"David Symonds" <dsymonds@gmail.com> writes:

Show 6 quoted lines

> If you use the contrib/completion/git-completion.bash script, you can
> type "git st<TAB>", and it'll complete it for you. Well, it did, until
> git-stash came along and ruined it...
>
> At any rate, the bash completion also completes things like branch
> names, which can be immensely helpful.

I don't use bash, but the zsh completion for git is also excellent.

But "git st" is still one less key to type than "git st<tab>" ;-).

-- 
Matthieu