git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

should git command and git-command be equivalent?

From
Ffranky <yinping@kooxoo.com>
Date
Oct 16, 2007, 03:22 UTC
Message-ID
<20071016032240.AD2FD7E80@mail.kooxoo.com>
	I use git-init frequently and it confuses me for a long time that I
can't init a bare repository. 
	I just found I can do that by "git -bare init". However, I get used
to "git-init" and I always tried "git-init -bare" (of course failed)
	And I thought git-init and "git init" were always the same as most
newbies of git. So, should git init and git-init be equivalent? If not, I
think the document should be supplemented to clarify this.
 franky
Next: Matthieu Moy
Message 1 of 6 in “should git command and git-command be equivalent?”
  1. frankyOct 16, 2007
  2. Matthieu MoyOct 16, 2007
  3. frankyOct 16, 2007
  4. Matthieu MoyOct 16, 2007
  5. David SymondsOct 16, 2007
  6. Matthieu MoyOct 16, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.