should git command and git-command be equivalent?
- From
- franky <yinping@kooxoo.com>
- Date
- Oct 16, 2007, 03:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071016032240.AD2FD7E80@mail.kooxoo.com>
I use git-init frequently and it confuses me for a long time that I can't init a bare repository. I just found I can do that by "git -bare init". However, I get used to "git-init" and I always tried "git-init -bare" (of course failed) And I thought git-init and "git init" were always the same as most newbies of git. So, should git init and git-init be equivalent? If not, I think the document should be supplemented to clarify this.
franky