Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: add exec command to launch a shell command
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Aug 5, 2010, 16:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqfwytnh0m.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTinWvJvNOj6Ga7LgTMmEF37GbZN=hQBFJz4EBry5@mail.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>> +in `$SHELL`, or the default shell if `$SHELL` is not set), so you can >> +use usual shell commands like "cd". The command is run from the > > I think that needs a definite article: ".. use the usual ..".
I don't think so, especially with a plural "commands" after. Googlefight agrees with me ("use the usual commands" => 350 results, "use usual commands" => 4900), but that's not a proof. Perhaps a native speaker could help?
Show 6 quoted lines
> As I pointed out in a previous comment to the series this sort of > debug code should either be converted to use "test" or we should > incorporate it into test-lib.sh and use it everywhere. > > I somewhat like the latter. It's sometimes hard to see what's going > wrong with our tests. It'd also translate to TAP subtests.
I'll do both: use test -f in a first patch, and propose alternative in the second. New patch serie follows.
I don't know TAP and TAP subtests, but if the functions exist, other patches can be added on top to improve them.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/