git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for branch.<name>.integrationonly

From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@imag.fr>
Date
Sep 20, 2007, 13:36 UTC
Message-ID
<vpq1wctsblf.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0709201413440.28395@racer.site>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Lars Hjemli wrote:
>
>> +branch.<name>.integrationonly::
>
> Why not have something like branch.<name>.mergeOptions instead?

Why make it plural? I agree that it's better to have a multiple values option than having just "true/false", which makes it more extensible, but I don't understand the kind of things you could put here that wouldn't be better located in a separate configuration option.

-- 
Matthieu
Previous: Johannes SchindelinNext: Lars Hjemli
Message 5 of 8 in “add support for per branch merge policy”
  1. 0/2 add support for per branch merge policyLars Hjemli, Sep 20, 2007
  2. 1/2 git-merge: add option --no-ffLars Hjemli, Sep 20, 2007
  3. 2/2 add support for branch.<name>.integrationonlyLars Hjemli, Sep 20, 2007
  4. Johannes SchindelinSep 20, 2007
  5. Matthieu MoySep 20, 2007
  6. Lars HjemliSep 20, 2007
  7. Johannes SchindelinSep 20, 2007
  8. Lars HjemliSep 20, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.