From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@imag.fr>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:36:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for branch.<name>.integrationonly
Message-ID: <vpq1wctsblf.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709201413440.28395@racer.site>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Lars Hjemli wrote:
>
>> +branch.<name>.integrationonly::
>
> Why not have something like branch.<name>.mergeOptions instead?

Why make it plural? I agree that it's better to have a multiple values
option than having just "true/false", which makes it more extensible,
but I don't understand the kind of things you could put here that
wouldn't be better located in a separate configuration option.

-- 
Matthieu