Re: [PATCH] xdiff: Show function names in hunk headers.

From: Mark Wooding <mdw@distorted.org.uk>
Date: Mar 29, 2006, 09:57 UTC
Message-ID: <slrne2kmgq.s3g.mdw@metalzone.distorted.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <7v4q1ihzio.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:

> Asciidoc?
>
>         . enumerated one
>           this is one item

I thought about this, and decided that missing these was a good thing, because item heads are probably too low-level. I'd rather go for section or subsection headings.

> It's just a heuristic, so there are only two things we could
> sensibly do.  Either we keep it absolutely stupid to save our
> code and sanity, or we give full configurability via -F regexp
> to the end users.

I'm already thinking about that...

-- [mdw]