Re: [PATCH 0/9] http-fetch fixes
- From
- Mark Wooding <mdw@distorted.org.uk>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2006, 15:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <slrndu1m14.2i8.mdw@metalzone.distorted.org.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060201153052.GA16461@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Uwe Zeisberger <zeisberg@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
>> The series applies to commit 1506fc34f7585880aeeb12b5fdfe2de4800f9df5. > after reverting c8568e139ed2149fbfb7ef9a8d819d5b6b7c554f it applies to > 8233340ce6eb700eb2cd9c0fef4d1705997c499b (=current master), too.
Good-oh. (I did pull the latest tip, and then panicked because Nick's change had already made it out.)
> With these patches applied, I get now a Segfault, while cloning > u-boot.
Oh. :-(
> Actually now I cannot reproduce it anymore. I added some debugging code > s.t. I can give more details if it reoccurs.
Please do. I've just tried, and I can't reproduce the problem either.
The watch-slots patch seems to uncover all manner of brokenness in http-fetch.c -- or I've violated some unwritten assumptions of a very deep nature, which is always possible.
Maybe the right thing to do is to go with Nick's separate-status- structures patch as an actual mainline fix, with my patches for http-fetch.c's other bugs as a belt-and-braces.
-- [mdw]