[PATCH v2 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed

This is the second iteration of changes to fix the segfault that I encountered while testing fsmonitor. This iteration includes the following updates for feedback I received on v1:

 * Use %u instead of %"PRIuMAX" for unsigned ints in BUG format strings
 * Updated the new test's comment to be more descriptive

Thanks,

William

William Baker (1):
  fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed

 fsmonitor.c                 | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env       | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env

base-commit: 5fa0f5238b0cd46cfe7f6fa76c3f526ea98148d9
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-372%2Fwilbaker%2Ffix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-372/wilbaker/fix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/372

Range-diff vs v1:

 1:  ce9bf4237e ! 1:  08741d986c fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
     @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
      +	struct cache_entry *ce;
      +	
      +	if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
     -+		BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %"PRIuMAX")",
     -+		    (uintmax_t)pos, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
     ++		BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %u)",
     ++		    (uintmax_t)pos, istate->cache_nr);
       
      +	ce = istate->cache[pos];
       	ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
     @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
       	istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
       
      +	if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
     -+		BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
     -+		    (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
     ++		BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
     ++		    (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
      +
       	trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor, "read fsmonitor extension successful");
       	return 0;
     @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@
       	int fixup = 0;
       
      +	if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
     -+		BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
     -+		    (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
     ++		BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
     ++		    (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
      +
       	put_be32(&hdr_version, INDEX_EXTENSION_VERSION);
       	strbuf_add(sb, &hdr_version, sizeof(uint32_t));
     @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@
       
       			/* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
      +			if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
     -+				BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
     -+				    (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
     ++				BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
     ++				    (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
       			ewah_each_bit(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
       
       			/* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor usage */
     @@ -109,8 +109,9 @@
       	test_cmp expect actual
       '
       
     -+# Use test files that start with 'z' so that the entries being added
     -+# and removed appear at the end of the index.
     ++# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
     ++# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
     ++# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them. 
      +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
      +	test_commit initial &&
      +	removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&