Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 10, 2019, 12:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1910101401310.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq1rvll5w8.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> "William Baker via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > > > This is the second iteration of changes to fix the segfault that I > > encountered while testing fsmonitor. This iteration includes the following > > updates for feedback I received on v1: > > > > * Use %u instead of %"PRIuMAX" for unsigned ints in BUG format strings > > * Updated the new test's comment to be more descriptive > > > > Thanks, > > > > William > > > > William Baker (1): > > fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed > > Thanks. Dscho, is this still Reviewed-by: you?
Yes!
Thanks, Dscho
P.S.: I guess we could even go and make this a `Co-Authored-by:` because the test case is actually by me, at least originally... ;-)
Show 74 quoted lines
>
> >
> > fsmonitor.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
> > t/t7519/fsmonitor-env | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 5fa0f5238b0cd46cfe7f6fa76c3f526ea98148d9
> > Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-372%2Fwilbaker%2Ffix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
> > Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-372/wilbaker/fix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
> > Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/372
> >
> > Range-diff vs v1:
> >
> > 1: ce9bf4237e ! 1: 08741d986c fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
> > @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
> > + struct cache_entry *ce;
> > +
> > + if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
> > -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %"PRIuMAX")",
> > -+ (uintmax_t)pos, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> > ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %u)",
> > ++ (uintmax_t)pos, istate->cache_nr);
> >
> > + ce = istate->cache[pos];
> > ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
> > @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
> > istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
> >
> > + if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> > -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> > -+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> > ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> > ++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> > +
> > trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor, "read fsmonitor extension successful");
> > return 0;
> > @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@
> > int fixup = 0;
> >
> > + if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> > -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> > -+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> > ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> > ++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> > +
> > put_be32(&hdr_version, INDEX_EXTENSION_VERSION);
> > strbuf_add(sb, &hdr_version, sizeof(uint32_t));
> > @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@
> >
> > /* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
> > + if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> > -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> > -+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> > ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> > ++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> > ewah_each_bit(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
> >
> > /* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor usage */
> > @@ -109,8 +109,9 @@
> > test_cmp expect actual
> > '
> >
> > -+# Use test files that start with 'z' so that the entries being added
> > -+# and removed appear at the end of the index.
> > ++# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
> > ++# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
> > ++# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
> > +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
> > + test_commit initial &&
> > + removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
>