hared GIT repos (was Re: rsync deprecated but promoted?)
- From
Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
- Date
- Sep 27, 2005, 06:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <pan.2005.09.27.06.35.35.834134@smurf.noris.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050926133204.GB21019@pasky.or.cz>
Hi, Petr Baudis wrote:
> The thing is, rsync is bad - it will happily put > duplicate, redundant, and especially unwanted data to your repository, > especially when the shared GIT repositories happen.
Speaking of which -- is anybody working on that one?
I find myself in need of a multiuser shared repository that cannot be corrupted (i.e. I want to prevent the users from removing objects, and replacing a ref with something that is not a child of the sha1 that's already there should also be prevented).
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
-- Donald Knuth