Re: hared GIT repos (was Re: rsync deprecated but promoted?)
- From
A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 27, 2005, 18:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <43399124.8020706@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <pan.2005.09.27.06.35.35.834134@smurf.noris.de>
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Hi, Petr Baudis wrote: > >>The thing is, rsync is bad - it will happily put >>duplicate, redundant, and especially unwanted data to your repository, >>especially when the shared GIT repositories happen. > > Speaking of which -- is anybody working on that one? > > I find myself in need of a multiuser shared repository that cannot > be corrupted (i.e. I want to prevent the users from removing objects, > and replacing a ref with something that is not a child of the sha1 that's > already there should also be prevented). >
Yes. Actually just the protocol spec so far. Although, progress has been interrupted by the process of moving to the SoCal area from Fla.