Re: ss/submodule-add-in-c, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2020, #05; Mon, 28)
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 7, 2021, 23:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2101080022310.2213@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqturvxa9t.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> * ss/submodule-add-in-c (2020-12-15) 3 commits > >> . t7400: add test to check 'submodule add' for tracked paths > >> . submodule: port submodule subcommand 'add' from shell to C > >> . dir: change the scope of function 'directory_exists_in_index()' > >> > >> "git submodule add" being rewritten in C. > >> > >> Expecting a reroll. > >> The patches are split incorrectly; part of 1/3 belongs to 2/3 > >> cf. <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2012190104140.56@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> > >> It seems to introduce a segfault on 'seen'. > >> cf. <xmqqft3xflw7.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> > > > > Maybe nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2012190104140.56@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet would be a > > better reference,... > > That is the first message-id referenced in the above, isn't it?
What I meant was to say that my message clarifies the segfault issue better than your reply...
Ciao, Dscho