Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Work around flakiness in t5500.43
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 26, 2020, 16:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2010261702410.56@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <20201023085021.GF4012156@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Jeff King wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 07:35:39PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > > > Changes since v1: > > > > * Instead of papering over the underlying cause, the patch was completely > > changed to actually fix the bug and add a proper regression test for it > > (originally, I wanted to act according to the common notion that good > > programmers are lazy, oh my, see how well that worked out for me). > > Thanks for fixing this. Your explanation looks thorough and the code > looks correct. Definitely patches 1 and 2 look good to me. I left a few > comments on patch 3.
Thank you.
After thinking about this for several days, I will drop patch 3/3 because it is unclear to me how to implement what you suggested without reverting the intention of Jonathan's patch that made `pkt-line` depend on `sideband` instead of the other way round.
Ciao, Dscho