git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Regression in git-subtree.sh, introduced in 2.20.1, after 315a84f9aa0e2e629b0680068646b0032518ebed

From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date
Dec 9, 2019, 15:26 UTC
Message-ID
<nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1912091615200.31080@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
In-Reply-To
<1676A670-C8B7-482B-B330-B03B35CB6B5E@msys.ch>
Hi,
On Mon, 9 Dec 2019, Marc Balmer wrote:
> I am not familiar with the source code, so I can not send in that
> revert.  I can, however, say that I am grateful to whomever does it ;)
I am against reverting the change without knowing the root cause.

The recent reporter only compared Git for Windows v2.19.0 vs v2.20.1, which is _quite_ a big difference.

For what I know, the problem might be a change in the MSYS2 runtime that is mistaken by some malware for malicious code (we did introduce some code to emulate Ctrl+C in MinTTY which injects a remote thread and executes ExitProcess() there, which might very well be construed as an attack, even if it is actually very much desired behavior).

These segmentation faults in `git subtree` on Windows have traditionally been _all_ because of overzealous anti-malware.

So first, a much more fine-grained analysis would be required, e.g. comparing v2.20.1 against v2.20.0, then copying _just_ the `git-subtree` file from a working into a non-working version (or vice versa; I would highly recommend using the portable versions for such side-by side comparison).

Ciao, Johannes

Show 128 quoted lines
>
> - Marc
>
>
> > Am 09.12.2019 um 15:18 schrieb Strain, Roger L. <roger.strain@swri.org>:
> >
> > As I said, I'm using a custom script here. I don't know if anybody else
> > benefited from the change and hasn't said anything, but I won't object
> > to someone submitting that revert.
> >
> > --
> > Roger
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Balmer <marc@msys.ch>
> > To: "Strain, Roger L." <roger.strain@swri.org>
> > Cc: ns@nadavsinai.com <ns@nadavsinai.com>, git@vger.kernel.org <
> > git@vger.kernel.org>, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de <
> > Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>, gitster@pobox.com <gitster@pobox.com>,
> > pclouds@gmail.com <pclouds@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: Regression in git-subtree.sh, introduced in 2.20.1, after
> > 315a84f9aa0e2e629b0680068646b0032518ebed
> > Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:13:47 +0100
> >
> > Roger,
> >
> > I am all for reverting it. if that does not cause any other regressions
> > or headaches (or both...)
> >
> > - Marc
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 09.12.2019 um 15:11 schrieb Strain, Roger L. <roger.strain@swri.org>
> > :
> >
> > I haven't been able to find anything relating to the issue, but I also
> > haven't had a repo that exposes the problem to test more thoroughly
> > against. If this happens to be a public repo somewhere, I'd be more
> > than happy to take a second look.
> >
> > That being said, if the community feels it would be better to revert
> > the changes that were introduced, I won't object. I've had to further
> > customize the script for our internal use, and those changes aren't
> > something that would be useful for the public at large. (A few changes
> > relate to the presence/absence of a specific file, which I certainly
> > wouldn't expect anyone else to have.) Short story is we're going to
> > have to use a custom script going forward, so keeping or reverting the
> > changes here make no difference to us. I still feel that the changes
> > which were made make the script more correct, but clearly there's some
> > undiagnosed logic error somewhere.
> >
> > Honestly, I'm surprised we didn't see this particular issue show up on
> > our own repo; it's ridiculously large and complex. At least if it had,
> > I'd be able to troubleshoot it more reliably.
> >
> > --
> > Roger Strain
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nadav SInai <ns@nadavsinai.com>
> > To: roger.strain@swri.org
> > Cc: Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com,
> > marc@msys.ch, pclouds@gmail.com
> > Subject: RE: Regression in git-subtree.sh, introduced in 2.20.1, after
> > 315a84f9aa0e2e629b0680068646b0032518ebed
> > Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 12:30:48 +0200
> >
> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> >
> > Hi, I'm curious if any of you had any luck in preventing that
> > seg-fault in git-subtree script
> > I'm encountering it myself using git 2.24.0.windows.2., seg-fault is
> > in the same while loop (currently on line 757)
> > When I tried your suggestion of adding the ($parents) ($rev) to the
> > progress print I see that the last commit have only one revision
> > printed
> > like this:
> >
> > 259/290 (523) [271] (843dd34090d36dfabd6a2e3e8459a4887427313b)
> > (a69ee056f66acf66c63f89f55d26c0cc17036623)
> > 259/290 (525) [273] (f5eea1a3cbe1e16acba53e8a9fe07b6525a8b97c)
> > (843dd34090d36dfabd6a2e3e8459a4887427313b)
> > 259/290 (527) [275] (82303752a428cf1d789ac9f156008adb2798b7b5)
> > (f5eea1a3cbe1e16acba53e8a9fe07b6525a8b97c)
> > 259/290 (528) [276]
> > (7187897883c9fb4d33d4c87a02b876f8603728ff05f0945ae2ce9f98a35135)
> > 259/290 (529) [277]
> > (a00a3665343439a426671958dd90ed0407a22cad9ac9f156008adb2798b7b5)
> > 259/290 (530) [278]
> > (90beb94ebd331c457d79d05341453f5829a50bfcd4c87a02b876f8603728ff)
> > 259/290 (531) [279]
> > (9582e0acbed1910173564e250f350b5cc4291a7f671958dd90ed0407a22cad)
> > 259/290 (532) [280]
> > (f183930d6fabd3dccdddc5ec35d754ad28caf3b879d05341453f5829a50bfc)
> > 259/290 (533) [281]
> > (c9309f3a38c41f7991d9e78ddb47f7e85b8521eb564e250f350b5cc4291a7f)
> > 259/290 (534) [282]
> > (3bcf08f63a0e2b93ecc376bd679a16c80e99e7b1ddc5ec35d754ad28caf3b8)
> > 259/290 (535) [283]
> > (134621bb55a0470cdf6519ce08d6909af43ce0e5d9e78ddb47f7e85b8521eb)
> > 259/290 (536) [284]
> > (edb3471fbba29748f9784d29b3cee1dee2df4b37c376bd679a16c80e99e7b1)
> > 259/290 (537) [285]
> > (dd947a095df07a32dfd56666a395a7c42b25ca116519ce08d6909af43ce0e5)
> > 259/290 (538) [286]
> > (a639e09d2cbe1ea1149c080c1c95b8b018340ae2784d29b3cee1dee2df4b37)
> > C:/Program Files/Git/mingw64/libexec/git-core\git-subtree: line 757:
> > 8853 Done                    eval "$grl"
> >     8854 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) | while read rev
> > parents; do
> >   process_split_commit "$rev" "$parents" 0;
> > done
> >
> > I downgraded git to 2.19.0-windows.1 and it works now.
> >
> >
> > I'm thankful for your insights
> > Nadav Sinai
> > Web Tech lead
> > Philips-Algotec
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Previous: Marc BalmerNext: Marc Balmer
Message 6 of 20 in “RE: Regression in git-subtree.sh, introduced in 2.20.1, after 315a84f9aa0e2e629b0680068646b0032518ebed”
  1. Nadav SInaiDec 8, 2019
  2. Strain, Roger L.Dec 9, 2019
  3. Marc BalmerDec 9, 2019
  4. Strain, Roger L.Dec 9, 2019
  5. Marc BalmerDec 9, 2019
  6. Johannes SchindelinDec 9, 2019
  7. Marc BalmerDec 9, 2019
  8. Johannes SchindelinDec 9, 2019
  9. Tom ClarksonDec 11, 2019
  10. Strain, Roger L.Dec 11, 2019
  11. Tom ClarksonDec 12, 2019
  12. Johannes SchindelinDec 13, 2019
  13. Marc BalmerDec 14, 2019
  14. Tom ClarksonDec 16, 2019
  15. Ed MasteDec 9, 2019
  16. Strain, Roger L.Dec 9, 2019
  17. Tom ClarksonDec 14, 2019
  18. Ed MasteDec 16, 2019
  19. Tom ClarksonDec 18, 2019
  20. Marc BalmerMar 12, 2020

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.