git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Regression in git-subtree.sh, introduced in 2.20.1, after 315a84f9aa0e2e629b0680068646b0032518ebed

From
Strain, Roger L. <roger.strain@swri.org>
Date
Dec 9, 2019, 14:18 UTC
Message-ID
<e19d7992acf0efc990aea356716a3afa34e13cb7.camel@swri.org>
In-Reply-To
<E8FC0E5F-DD83-4470-B068-21865ECA84D2@msys.ch>

As I said, I'm using a custom script here. I don't know if anybody else benefited from the change and hasn't said anything, but I won't object to someone submitting that revert.

-- 
Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Balmer <marc@msys.ch>
To: "Strain, Roger L." <roger.strain@swri.org>
Cc: ns@nadavsinai.com <ns@nadavsinai.com>, git@vger.kernel.org <
git@vger.kernel.org>, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de <
Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>, gitster@pobox.com <gitster@pobox.com>, 
pclouds@gmail.com <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in git-subtree.sh, introduced in 2.20.1, after
315a84f9aa0e2e629b0680068646b0032518ebed
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:13:47 +0100

Roger,

I am all for reverting it. if that does not cause any other regressions
or headaches (or both...)

- Marc



Am 09.12.2019 um 15:11 schrieb Strain, Roger L. <roger.strain@swri.org>
:

I haven't been able to find anything relating to the issue, but I also
haven't had a repo that exposes the problem to test more thoroughly
against. If this happens to be a public repo somewhere, I'd be more
than happy to take a second look.

That being said, if the community feels it would be better to revert
the changes that were introduced, I won't object. I've had to further
customize the script for our internal use, and those changes aren't
something that would be useful for the public at large. (A few changes
relate to the presence/absence of a specific file, which I certainly
wouldn't expect anyone else to have.) Short story is we're going to
have to use a custom script going forward, so keeping or reverting the
changes here make no difference to us. I still feel that the changes
which were made make the script more correct, but clearly there's some
undiagnosed logic error somewhere.

Honestly, I'm surprised we didn't see this particular issue show up on
our own repo; it's ridiculously large and complex. At least if it had,
I'd be able to troubleshoot it more reliably.

--  
Roger Strain

-----Original Message-----
From: Nadav SInai <ns@nadavsinai.com>
To: roger.strain@swri.org
Cc: Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com,
marc@msys.ch, pclouds@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Regression in git-subtree.sh, introduced in 2.20.1, after
315a84f9aa0e2e629b0680068646b0032518ebed
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 12:30:48 +0200

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Hi, I'm curious if any of you had any luck in preventing that
seg-fault in git-subtree script
I'm encountering it myself using git 2.24.0.windows.2., seg-fault is
in the same while loop (currently on line 757)
When I tried your suggestion of adding the ($parents) ($rev) to the
progress print I see that the last commit have only one revision
printed
like this:

259/290 (523) [271] (843dd34090d36dfabd6a2e3e8459a4887427313b)
(a69ee056f66acf66c63f89f55d26c0cc17036623)
259/290 (525) [273] (f5eea1a3cbe1e16acba53e8a9fe07b6525a8b97c)
(843dd34090d36dfabd6a2e3e8459a4887427313b)
259/290 (527) [275] (82303752a428cf1d789ac9f156008adb2798b7b5)
(f5eea1a3cbe1e16acba53e8a9fe07b6525a8b97c)
259/290 (528) [276]
(7187897883c9fb4d33d4c87a02b876f8603728ff05f0945ae2ce9f98a35135)
259/290 (529) [277]
(a00a3665343439a426671958dd90ed0407a22cad9ac9f156008adb2798b7b5)
259/290 (530) [278]
(90beb94ebd331c457d79d05341453f5829a50bfcd4c87a02b876f8603728ff)
259/290 (531) [279]
(9582e0acbed1910173564e250f350b5cc4291a7f671958dd90ed0407a22cad)
259/290 (532) [280]
(f183930d6fabd3dccdddc5ec35d754ad28caf3b879d05341453f5829a50bfc)
259/290 (533) [281]
(c9309f3a38c41f7991d9e78ddb47f7e85b8521eb564e250f350b5cc4291a7f)
259/290 (534) [282]
(3bcf08f63a0e2b93ecc376bd679a16c80e99e7b1ddc5ec35d754ad28caf3b8)
259/290 (535) [283]
(134621bb55a0470cdf6519ce08d6909af43ce0e5d9e78ddb47f7e85b8521eb)
259/290 (536) [284]
(edb3471fbba29748f9784d29b3cee1dee2df4b37c376bd679a16c80e99e7b1)
259/290 (537) [285]
(dd947a095df07a32dfd56666a395a7c42b25ca116519ce08d6909af43ce0e5)
259/290 (538) [286]
(a639e09d2cbe1ea1149c080c1c95b8b018340ae2784d29b3cee1dee2df4b37)
C:/Program Files/Git/mingw64/libexec/git-core\git-subtree: line 757:
8853 Done                    eval "$grl"
     8854 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) | while read rev
parents; do
   process_split_commit "$rev" "$parents" 0;
done

I downgraded git to 2.19.0-windows.1 and it works now.


I'm thankful for your insights
Nadav Sinai
Web Tech lead
Philips-Algotec
Previous: Marc BalmerNext: Marc Balmer
Message 4 of 20 in “RE: Regression in git-subtree.sh, introduced in 2.20.1, after 315a84f9aa0e2e629b0680068646b0032518ebed”
  1. Nadav SInaiDec 8, 2019
  2. Strain, Roger L.Dec 9, 2019
  3. Marc BalmerDec 9, 2019
  4. Strain, Roger L.Dec 9, 2019
  5. Marc BalmerDec 9, 2019
  6. Johannes SchindelinDec 9, 2019
  7. Marc BalmerDec 9, 2019
  8. Johannes SchindelinDec 9, 2019
  9. Tom ClarksonDec 11, 2019
  10. Strain, Roger L.Dec 11, 2019
  11. Tom ClarksonDec 12, 2019
  12. Johannes SchindelinDec 13, 2019
  13. Marc BalmerDec 14, 2019
  14. Tom ClarksonDec 16, 2019
  15. Ed MasteDec 9, 2019
  16. Strain, Roger L.Dec 9, 2019
  17. Tom ClarksonDec 14, 2019
  18. Ed MasteDec 16, 2019
  19. Tom ClarksonDec 18, 2019
  20. Marc BalmerMar 12, 2020

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.