jk/code-of-conduct, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #02; Mon, 7)
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 8, 2019, 19:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1910082111220.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq36g5444k.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with > '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with > '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of > the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. > > You can find the changes described here in the integration branches > of the repositories listed at > > http://git-blame.blogspot.com/p/git-public-repositories.html > > -------------------------------------------------- > [...] > [New Topics] > > [...]
I missed a well-ACKed contribution in here: the code of conduct Peff kindly submitted, with the add-on that clarifies who is in that group of potential mediators. See
https://public-inbox.org/git/20190924064454.GA30419@sigill.intra.peff.net/
and
https://public-inbox.org/git/20190926072046.GB20653@sigill.intra.peff.net/
As far as I can tell, there was only one critical voice, Gábor, and when I responded asking for clarifications which part of the code of conduct exactly would require any change of behavior, there was no response, which I took as a silent sign of acquiescence.
René also offered concerns about a part of the code of conduct that they considered to be too vague, but I think both Peff and I explained why it should remain as-is (again, there was no response, which I, again, am forced to interpret, and I interpret it as agreeing to the points made in particular by Peff).
In contrast, the patch won support from the cURL maintainer (https://public-inbox.org/git/alpine.DEB.2.20.1909250834220.4757@tvnag.unkk.fr/), and endorsements (also known as ACKs) from myself (https://public-inbox.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1909241426580.15067@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet/), from Stolee (https://public-inbox.org/git/6a9fb4c2-6c80-4475-03d3-89bdba73095b@gmail.com/), from Phillip Wood (although I don't dare to interpet this as a full ACK) (https://public-inbox.org/git/cc8cc0b3-777c-6ef8-202f-ea1d0518bbd3@gmail.com/), from Garima (https://public-inbox.org/git/133b46b2-b2e1-4673-820b-5a5ca6ec0269@gmail.com/), from Jonathan Tan (https://public-inbox.org/git/20190924172324.104795-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/), from Thomas Gummerer (https://public-inbox.org/git/20190924174056.GA55104@cat/), from brian (https://public-inbox.org/git/20190924233728.6iueqaktlhhfwn7k@camp.crustytoothpaste.net/), and from Elijah (https://public-inbox.org/git/CABPp-BERhEp2At-ABPrkCHcqLfb32t+S0hPHs=d17QjcZR1wPA@mail.gmail.com/).
In other words, the commit message can be augmented by this:
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Junio, would you mind picking it up, please?
Ciao, Dscho