Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] push: do not pretend to return `int` from `die_push_simple()`
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 4, 2019, 09:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1910041136150.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq36g9bgl6.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 31 quoted lines
> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> > writes: > > > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > > > > This function is marked as `NORETURN`, and it indeed does not want to > > return anything. So let's not declare it with the return type `int`. > > This fixes the following warning when building with MSVC: > > > > C4646: function declared with 'noreturn' has non-void return type > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > > --- > > builtin/push.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/builtin/push.c b/builtin/push.c > > index 021dd3b1e4..d216270d5f 100644 > > --- a/builtin/push.c > > +++ b/builtin/push.c > > @@ -143,8 +143,8 @@ static int push_url_of_remote(struct remote *remote, const char ***url_p) > > return remote->url_nr; > > } > > > > -static NORETURN int die_push_simple(struct branch *branch, > > - struct remote *remote) > > +static NORETURN void die_push_simple(struct branch *branch, > > + struct remote *remote) > > Haha ;-) "I won't return and I'll return int" sounds like an > oxymoron.
Funny, right? ;-)
I was a bit concerned that GCC did not catch it, nor Clang, but hey, that's the benefit of compiling with more than just one compiler.
Ciao, Dscho
Show 5 quoted lines
>
> > {
> > /*
> > * There's no point in using shorten_unambiguous_ref here,
>