Re: [PATCH] add a Code of Conduct document
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 25, 2019, 12:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1909251424380.15067@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190924210918.GC20858@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Jeff King wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:14:55PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote: > > > > +* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or > > > political attacks > > > > Hmm. Trolling can be helpful, if done right. I consider this to be > > a good example: https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/. Wrote > > some texts that look like that.. > > I suppose one man's joke is another man's troll. [...]
And we could now try to dive into that rabbit hole and discuss every detail about it, but...
Show 6 quoted lines
> [...] > > Again, I really think the point here is not to enumerate all > possibilities. It's to set some general expectations, and to make it > clear that we value the idea of having a genial atmosphere for > communication that we have a document and a reporting mechanism.
This is a very important point. No CoC can be complete, ever, just like Git will probably never be complete.
The proposed solution is to give power to a committee of trusted members of the Git developer community. The key word here is _trust_. I don't think there can be any doubt that Junio, Peff, Christian and Ævar have earned the trust of the Git developer community.
For those two reasons, I am totally fine with leaving mostly hypothetical scenarios a little vague. Because I trust that committee.
Ciao, Dscho